Give It A Chance? is a series of articles based around the horribly overused quote “give it a chance”. Exploring the idea of whether a film has been misjudged or a constant reminder of just because some art forms CAN be exhibited doesn’t mean they SHOULD.
So there I was; at home on a Friday night and needing a creative fix. I thought to myself that maybe a movie would help. Though instead of choosing something that I have been meaning to watch, I thought it was time to give something else a try. After reviewing and watching as many films as I have, many a friend have told me that I have become too “jaded” or “cynical” when watching a film. Friends would tell me that I constantly write something off without just giving it a chance. So it was with that mindset that I took an open mind to check out the critically butchered: Jack and Jill.
Now I won’t divulge who the person who recommended this movie was; but I can tell you he is no fan of Adam Sandler. I on the other hand, have been a fan of his since his days on “SNL” and love his early work such as “Happy Gilmore” and “Billy Madison. This recent Sandler outing however is a far-cry for what in comparison to his earlier days could be described as “genius”.
This movie has no real structure or narrative and simply led me to constantly ask the question “why?” and mutter the response “huh”. The movie begins with what is the only not completely horrible sequences which consist of documentary footage resembling “When Harry Met Sally” and fake home movie footage of the titular characters ala “Happy Gilmore”. Sadly, its from those sequences that the movie is just a steady downhill slope down to the deepest trenches of truly bad movies.
The real problem with this movie (beyond it’s premise) is that Sandler actually is a talented person. But in an ironic twist the film also stars Al Pacino as himself playing someone also capable of so much better. The movie tries to even play to fans of Adam Sandler’s “SNL” days with cameos by David Spade, Tim Meadows, and Dana Carvey. But much like these poorly used cameos, this movie is just a complete waste of time. Adam Sandler has reached George Lucas status. To those question what that means; it’s when you continue to make money off the idea of how something was once good and have done nothing but deteriorate that original idea to the point of total creative annihilation. This George Lucas status has continued to where now Sandler is just surrounded by so many “yes men” who not dare challenge these horrible ideas in fear of not collecting a check.
Whether it’s the blatant product placement in the scene’s tired LA setting or just the act-by-numbers performances; I can’t tell what annoyed me more. This movie is the equivalent of eating at a Taco-Bell for some form of nourishment only to find yourself physically sick afterwards. Although the truly saddest part of this movie is that the movie’s core audience (idiots) will more likely recognize Jared “from Subway” Fogle (yes, he has a meaningless cameo too) rather than Al Pacino. This movie was purely awful, mind-numbing, and probably one of my biggest regrets watching. I truly pity the film critics who were forced to watch this sad excuse of entertainment. So if you’re asking whether or not you should “give this movie a chance” please heed this warning and run far, far away.
Verdict: DON”T GIVE IT A CHANCE
















